小池百合子氏・世界に発信
Yuriko Koike, Japan's former defense minister and national security adviser, was Chairwoman of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party's General Council and currently is a member of the National Diet. read more
AUG 28, 2014 8
Ending East Asia’s History Wars
TOKYO – Georges Clemenceau, who, as France’s prime minister, led his country to victory in World War I, famously said that “war is too important to be left to the generals.” Japan is now discovering that history is too important to be left to newspaper editors.
In the 1990s, the newspaper Asahi Shimbun caused a firestorm at home and in South Korea by publishing a series of articles, based upon testimony by the former Japanese soldier Seiji Yoshida, on “comfort women” – Koreans forced to provide sexual services to the Japanese Imperial Army during World War II. Asahi has now admitted that the soldier’s confessions were unfounded, and has disavowed the core supporting evidence for the articles.
That retraction appears to be causing as much embarrassment – and diplomatic vitriol – in Japan and South Korea today as the original series did. But, at a time when both countries cannot afford to permit partisan or sloppy abuses of history to roil their bilateral relations, Asahi’s careless work has turned out to be more than abysmal journalism; it has introduced a dangerous element into regional diplomacy.
Some say that Japan and South Korea should follow the example set by France and Germany. Reconciling in the first two decades following the Nazi Occupation of France, these countries’ leaders understood that their security and economic ties were far too important to their citizens’ wellbeing to allow the old hatreds to fester. They knew that the unimaginable violence of WWII was a direct result of the antagonisms that had festered since the Napoleonic Wars and that were allowed to persist after 1918.
In Charles de Gaulle and Konrad Adenauer, France and Germany had two of the twentieth century’s greatest statesmen, leaders who were able to discern the broad sweep of history through the fog of quotidian politics. Their loyalty was not only to the citizens who elected them, but also to the generations of the past that had endured the consequences of Franco-German enmity, and to generations yet to come, which would benefit from reconciliation.
Of course, given that Japan and Korea have not fought a series of wars against each other, their relationship is not the same as that between Germany and France. But it is clear that no one will benefit from a new round of heated historical debate. To avoid this, political leaders like de Gaulle and Adenauer are needed. Only when we can discuss the past without endangering the future will the countries of Northeast Asia be able to establish a truly durable structure of peace.
As Admiral Dennis C. Blair, a former commander of the US Pacific Fleet, stated at a recent conference, “The history of Asia from the 1930s to about 1955 or so was not pretty in any way….I don’t think any country can have a monopoly on righteousness, or on guilt and shame” for that time. Blair added that “the attempt to hold a ‘we were right’ and ‘you were wrong’ sweepstakes is not going to help our children and grandchildren understand what happened there.”
Japan and South Korea need to take responsibility for the future, not obsess about the past. A recent Japanese government white paper called South Korea the country “that shares the closest relationship with Japan historically and in areas such as economy and culture.” No doubt, many, if not most, South Korean foreign-policy experts and strategists share that sentiment. But it will take committed leadership to transcend the history wars and tap the full potential of Japanese-Korean cooperation, something that both countries’ key ally, the United States, strongly desires, as it seeks to draw China into a lasting and peaceful Asian order.
For too long, intemperate historical debates – often driven by biased newspaper accounts – have poisoned bilateral relations. Now, as another war of words heats up, Japanese and South Korean leaders need to step back, recognize where the real interests of their people lie, both today and in the future, and calmly begin to take the measures required to ensure durable reconciliation.
ー
朝日新聞誤報への海外の反応
「性奴隷」という悪意表現を否定。
台湾春秋
台湾は日本の鏡です
全体表示
[ リスト ]
. <日本を貶めて喜ぶ反日日本人のルーツ
正確な事実より別の意図を感じる朝日の吉田調書報道>
.
朝日の慰安婦虚報 日本糾弾の発信役に
.
2014/8/18(月) 午前 7:27
無題
アジア情勢
.
ナイス！1
mixiチェック
はてなブックマーク
転載
.
「米国での慰安婦問題に関する動きを報じてきた立場から、朝日の虚報が日本の名誉を不当におとしめた罪は計り知れない」という、古森義久・産経ワシントン特派員の「朝日虚報、日本糾弾の発信役」を紹介しコメントする。
「日本の慰安婦問題を米国内で初めて非難し始めたのは１９９２年に創設された“慰安婦問題ワシントン連合”という組織だ。ちょうど朝日新聞が“日本の官憲が朝鮮人女性を強制連行した”と本格的に報じ出した時期である。
少数の在米韓国系活動家によるこの組織は首都の議事堂や教会、大学で展示をして、“日本軍により組織的に強制連行され、性の奴隷にされた約２０万の女性”の悲劇と宣伝した。
当時、取材にあたった私が同組織の人間にその主張の根拠を問うと、“日本側の当事者の証言や新聞報道”という答えだった。
その後、米国内での日本糾弾には中国系の“世界抗日戦争史実維護連合会”という強力な組織が加わって、陰の主役となり、活動は雪だるまのように大きくなった。その頂点が２００７年７月の連邦議会下院での日本非難決議だった。
このプロセスでの日本攻撃の矢は一貫して“軍による女性の組織的な強制連行”に絞られた。決議が“日本帝国陸軍による若い女性の性的奴隷への強制”と明記したのがその総括だ。
決議を主唱したマイク・ホンダは、審議の過程で第二次大戦後の日本でも米軍が日本側に売春施設を開かせたという報道に対し、“日本軍は政策として女性を拉致しセックスを強制したが、米軍は強制連行とは全く異なる”と強調した。
同決議案を審議する公聴会の議長を務めたエニ・ファレオマバエンガ議員は“米国も人権侵害は犯してきたが、日本のように軍の政策として強制的に若い女性たちを性の奴隷にしたことはない”と断言した。
要するに米国からみての悪の核心は、“日本軍による女性の組織的な強制連行”に尽きていた。その主張の土台は明らかにすべて日本から発信された“証言、資料、報道”だ。その発信役が朝日新聞だった。
だがいまや朝日自身がその全てが虚構だというのだから事態は深刻だ。とくに慰安婦狩りをしたとする吉田清治証言は、審議で最大の参考とされた議会調査局報告書の基礎となったのだから、決議自体が日本にとって冤罪といえる。
朝日が３０年以上も発し続けた慰安婦問題の虚報が、米国や国際社会の日本糾弾を招いた。“日本軍の強制連行”が事実でないとわかっていれば、こんな日本たたきはなかった。米国ではいまでも慰安婦の像や碑が建てられている。
しかし朝日新聞は公器としての責任をとろうとはしない。虚報や誤報の自認や取り消しをしながら、論点をそらせ“慰安婦問題の本質 直視を”と逃げている。被害者側としては“朝日問題の本質 直視を”と訴えたい。」
日本と日本人を米国議会や国連で、言われなきレイプ国家やレイプ民族に貶める原因を作りながら、論点をそらせ、責任逃れに汲々とする朝日新聞の態度は、公器のそれでなく、犯罪者のよくする行動そのものである。
今こそ国会はその役割を果たすべきである。朝日新聞の責任者とその虚報を土台にして恥ずべき談話を発表してしまった河野元議長を国会に呼び、真相を究明すべきである。日本外交もこの際、世界に広まったレイプ国家の冤罪を雪ぐ努力を強力にすべきだ。
ー
ASAHI SHIMBUN Falso relatório do jornal
..... (Sr. MIZUMA MASANORI)
◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆
● 5. que colocou um artigo (38) que exigiu desculpa e uma correção de editor e mim para o relatório que a esperança de difusão urgente. Asahi Shimbun (o agosto edição matutina) foi colocado em assunto de inspeção de senhora de caridade, correção, artigo de cancelamento e magajine "SAPIO"
■ The hot summer when it depended on waiting came over. The Asahi Shimbun admitted that the issue of charity dame was the great false report of the century. The Asahi Shimbun has not yet apologized to the nation by this article in spite of it either.
As for the false report of the charity dame problem that the Asahi Shimbun reported for these more than 20 years, several hundred times of the STAP cell diminished the national nation and must begin what at first the Asahi Shimbun performs because the person in charge who included the reporter who wrote the article of the charity dame problem in the 1990s and the alumnus of a section related to kneels on the ground in knee soul to gravel of Yasukuni shrine.
Because it was in a situation that I can restore reputation of our country at a stroke in cooperation with awoken Internet users, this article prays for what is scattered by the nation that there is good sense of the whole country eagerly.
The Asahi Shimbun (the August 5 morning edition) placed inspection and a correction, features about the issue of charity dame "answered the question of the reader how you conveyed the issue of charity dame" and the cancellation of the article. If "the testimony that Yoshida took a charity dame to in Jeju Island is false, judge it, and cancel an article", "the document which the militaries took like kidnapping systematically is not found" in that; canceled it with the correction of an article past totally, "the girl volunteer corps pointed to "the girl work volunteer corps" which mobilized a woman in the munitions factories under the wartime, and was different from a charity dame at all". It is disqualification as the mass media to have taken more than 20 years until this inspection. If it is the proper media, it is the usual way to cancel a correction and the article within one month after having a mistake pointed out by an expert. I reflect on the Asahi Shimbun not making the body of the newspaper publisher deeply, and it is necessary I cease to publish it once, and to come again.
Still, the severest "weekly new tide" which it criticized does final proofreading for the Asahi Shimbun, and it is the timing when it does not think accidentally by chance to have placed an inspection article on Tuesday on the next day when I entered in Bon vacation that it is temporizing. I resemble closely with an entertainer setting an inconvenient press conference at the end of the year New Year holidays ago and am laughable.
■ Para um artigo de senhora de caridade do Asahi Shimbun convencional, como para o assunto de. a senhora de caridade", crítica infundada para ser uma falsificação do Asahi Shimbun está com um apóie hoje. que melhora … É quando luz tinha começado a ser o assunto de. senhora de caridade que eu defendo, e um artigo de inspeção começa. e para. onde eu assumi uma atitude desafiante, e o estudo não prosseguiu pelo artigo passado nos cedo 90s The Asahi Shimbun does not seem to be able to yet understand that I am in the edge of a precipice.
The Asahi Shimbun does an excuse to cause an amateur group and misunderstanding not a professional group, there is it with "making that it is not a fact like a fact with Koujien by "a forgery", and saying", and is it not the "charity dame article" thing that the conventional Asahi Shimbun reported? Will talk about it to be a bad loser.
ASAHI SHIMBUN false report
..... (Mr. MIZUMA MASANORI)
◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆
● 5. lequel a placé un article (38) qui a demandé des excuses et une correction d'un éditeur et moi pour le rapport qui l'espoir de la diffusion urgent. Asahi Shimbun (l'édition du matin de l'août) a été placé dans la question d'inspection de la femme de la charité, correction, article de l'annulation et magajine "SAPIO"
■ The hot summer when it depended on waiting came over. The Asahi Shimbun admitted that the issue of charity dame was the great false report of the century. The Asahi Shimbun has not yet apologized to the nation by this article in spite of it either.
As for the false report of the charity dame problem that the Asahi Shimbun reported for these more than 20 years, several hundred times of the STAP cell diminished the national nation and must begin what at first the Asahi Shimbun performs because the person in charge who included the reporter who wrote the article of the charity dame problem in the 1990s and the alumnus of a section related to kneels on the ground in knee soul to gravel of Yasukuni shrine.
Because it was in a situation that I can restore reputation of our country at a stroke in cooperation with awoken Internet users, this article prays for what is scattered by the nation that there is good sense of the whole country eagerly.
The Asahi Shimbun (the August 5 morning edition) placed inspection and a correction, features about the issue of charity dame "answered the question of the reader how you conveyed the issue of charity dame" and the cancellation of the article. If "the testimony that Yoshida took a charity dame to in Jeju Island is false, judge it, and cancel an article", "the document which the militaries took like kidnapping systematically is not found" in that; canceled it with the correction of an article past totally, "the girl volunteer corps pointed to "the girl work volunteer corps" which mobilized a woman in the munitions factories under the wartime, and was different from a charity dame at all". It is disqualification as the mass media to have taken more than 20 years until this inspection. If it is the proper media, it is the usual way to cancel a correction and the article within one month after having a mistake pointed out by an expert. I reflect on the Asahi Shimbun not making the body of the newspaper publisher deeply, and it is necessary I cease to publish it once, and to come again.
Still, the severest "weekly new tide" which it criticized does final proofreading for the Asahi Shimbun, and it is the timing when it does not think accidentally by chance to have placed an inspection article on Tuesday on the next day when I entered in Bon vacation that it is temporizing. I resemble closely with an entertainer setting an inconvenient press conference at the end of the year New Year holidays ago and am laughable.
■ Pour un article de la femme de la charité de l'Asahi Shimbun conventionnel, comme pour la question de. "femme de la charité, la critique sans fondement être un faux de l'Asahi Shimbun est avec un côté aujourd'hui. lequel améliore … C'est lorsque la lumière avait commencé à être la question de. femme de la charité que je défends, et un article de l'inspection commence. et pour. où j'ai assumé une attitude provocante, et l'étude n'est pas entrée devant à travers l'article passé dans le début des années 90s The Asahi Shimbun does not seem to be able to yet understand that I am in the edge of a precipice.
The Asahi Shimbun does an excuse to cause an amateur group and misunderstanding not a professional group, there is it with "making that it is not a fact like a fact with Koujien by "a forgery", and saying", and is it not the "charity dame article" thing that the conventional Asahi Shimbun reported? Will talk about it to be a bad loser.
-
ASAHI SIMBUN false report
CommentsAdd Star where I recognized the past article of the 2014-08-07 Asahi Shimbun "issue of charity dame" as a false report
(the morning edition dated August 5, 2014)
The anti-Japan mark charity dame that the Asahi Shimbun reported it from 1982
I canceled it in acknowledgment of the error of the problem article totally.
Of the Masanori Mizuma effort that was worked on in this problem while it was long
In taking up crystallization here, and telling all of you widely
I did it. (whole sentence publication)
水間政憲拝 （Ｍｒ. ＭＩＺＵＭＡ MASANORI）
◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆
● 》 which placed an article (38) that demanded apology and a correction from an editor and me for the report that the urgent diffusion hope 《 Asahi Shimbun (the August 5 morning edition) was placed in issue of charity dame inspection, correction, cancellation article and magajine"SAPIO"
■ The hot summer when it depended on waiting came over. The Asahi Shimbun admitted that the issue of charity dame was the great false report of the century. The Asahi Shimbun has not yet apologized to the nation by this article in spite of it either.
As for the false report of the charity dame problem that the Asahi Shimbun reported for these more than 20 years, several hundred times of the STAP cell diminished the national nation and must begin what at first the Asahi Shimbun performs because the person in charge who included the reporter who wrote the article of the charity dame problem in the 1990s and the alumnus of a section related to kneels on the ground in knee soul to gravel of Yasukuni shrine.
Because it was in a situation that I can restore reputation of our country at a stroke in cooperation with awoken Internet users, this article prays for what is scattered by the nation that there is good sense of the whole country eagerly.
The Asahi Shimbun (the August 5 morning edition) placed inspection and a correction, features about the issue of charity dame "answered the question of the reader how you conveyed the issue of charity dame" and the cancellation of the article. If "the testimony that Yoshida took a charity dame to in Jeju Island is false, judge it, and cancel an article", "the document which the militaries took like kidnapping systematically is not found" in that; canceled it with the correction of an article past totally, "the girl volunteer corps pointed to "the girl work volunteer corps" which mobilized a woman in the munitions factories under the wartime, and was different from a charity dame at all". It is disqualification as the mass media to have taken more than 20 years until this inspection. If it is the proper media, it is the usual way to cancel a correction and the article within one month after having a mistake pointed out by an expert. I reflect on the Asahi Shimbun not making the body of the newspaper publisher deeply, and it is necessary I cease to publish it once, and to come again.
Still, the severest "weekly new tide" which it criticized does final proofreading for the Asahi Shimbun, and it is the timing when it does not think accidentally by chance to have placed an inspection article on Tuesday on the next day when I entered in Bon vacation that it is temporizing. I resemble closely with an entertainer setting an inconvenient press conference at the end of the year New Year holidays ago and am laughable.
■ For a charity dame article of the conventional Asahi Shimbun, as for the issue of 〈" charity dame, groundless criticism to be a forgery of the Asahi Shimbun is up with one side today. … 〉 and .〉 where I assumed a defiant attitude, and the study did not go ahead through the past article in the early 90s when light had begun to be the issue of 〈 charity dame I defend , and an inspection article starts. The Asahi Shimbun does not seem to be able to yet understand that I am in the edge of a precipice.
The Asahi Shimbun does an excuse to cause an amateur group and misunderstanding not a professional group, there is it with "making that it is not a fact like a fact with Koujien by "a forgery", and saying", and is it not the "charity dame article" thing that the conventional Asahi Shimbun reported? Will talk about it to be a bad loser.
■ A note of protest "places a quotation article in the article of distortion "》" the head office in Asahi Shimbun (38 August 5 morning editions) 《 SAPIO.
I protested journalist Masanori Mizuma and others of SAPIO editor and the writer saying that I distorted the content such as the Asahi Shimbun Korea versions which I quoted intentionally and it was remarkable and injured honor and trust of Asahi Shimbun and sent a document to demand to place apology and the article of the correction to ,〈 article for a report of the me of "SAPIO" where consistency did not match this inspection article in the Asahi Shimbun … 〉 or the article that I quoted were contents to introduce the kisang (kisang) of the 〈 Korea tradition to, and there were not the word "charity dame" and the description about the charity dame. However, it is a folly to deserve so that ten thousand die that I ignore my own faults about the study order that and "the historic process that I found my way to from a kisang for high pay becomes clear as for most of battlefield charity dames by reading an article of the morning sun" 〉 and Asahi Shimbun which I described took up as a witness of the charity dame on a large scale not having reported a thing from kisang school until this inspection article, and slander slanders me in "the contents which it is remarkable, and damage our honor and trust with distorting a quotation article intentionally, and there not being the confirmation coverage to us" and 〉 and the space doing it in the ,〈 Asahi Shimbun public relations department.
Though the social conditions of the then Korean Peninsula know it very clearly when I read through the Korea version Asahi Shimbun the Asahi Shimbun from 1915 to 1945, for more than 20 years, "a study did not advance" until now, and do not escape. It is a groundless margin to fool the nation. Though the Asahi Shimbun employed several parttimers and only let you check the Asahi Shimbun for Korea for several months and I abducted a woman in the Korean Peninsula and kidnapped you, and Manchurian and the South Seas area knew that the criminal who sold it off was an all Korean as a prostitute, me might ignore publishing it serially in "SAPIO". The reporter of the young society region which answered it which was produced with the thanks expected a little in the future Asahi Shimbun when "you might do it more" when you asked two reporters it for a reporter when you were interviewed for the article "agitation society" special feature first of the Asahi Shimbun of April 29, 2010 when "not bad though I published the report which just criticized the Asahi Shimbun in SAPIO serially" by having been. Because I met it whether , the reporter whom "it is sudden, and me did in ・・・ movement topic in the section that the reporter cannot write the article at the age of the timing when I go to the Asahi Shimbun head office and have provided the document of the scoop, and it is possible for article" "are before it for half a year", I met it "only with more in front of that there was recently", but because it is a dream come true, and an inarticulate thing appeared by an inspection article at this time a lot if the Asahi Shimbun faces the all-out war, I demanded what "I have the committee come to the Asahi Shimbun, and Representative Nariaki Nakayama inspects it" in House of Representatives Committee on the Budget on March 8, last year and does from a chairperson, but want you to realize it by all means in an extraordinary session of the Diet then. I have you invite the me as a witness and hope that I can testify that the Asahi Shimbun does not make the body as the newspaper publisher eagerly then. By the way, triggered by the document which me offered, there was "the possibility that was able to prevent the first Fukushima nuclear plant accident" when an investigation article of TEPCO was placed thoroughly. It is a place to wish that I can have a quarrel with the Asahi Shimbun by all means in the Diet eagerly.
If sincere inspected the Asahi Shimbun for Korea, the Asahi Shimbun could understand the actual situation of the Korean Peninsula, and there would be the correction of the great false report earlier. For these more than 20 years, what slander slandered not thanking the me who worked who I checked an article for Korea which the Asahi Shimbun should run steadily for several years, and regained honor and the pride of the national nation in the space would originally fool many nations that a book of the me was had in its hand and was awoken.
※ Journalist Masanori Mizuma, Only as for the Internet, it is reproduction-free 〈 condition, whole sentence publication 〉 http://mizumajyoukou.blog57.fc2.com/
-
朝日新聞「慰安婦問題」の過去記事は誤報と認めた
（ ２０１４年８月５日付朝刊 ）
朝日新聞は１９８２年から報道してきた反日的慰安婦
問題記事の誤りを認め全面的に取り消しました。
永い間この問題に取り組んでこられた水間政憲氏努力の
結晶をここに取り上げ広く皆々様にお伝えすることに
致しました。（全文掲載）
水間政憲拝
◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆
●緊急拡散希望《朝日新聞（8月5日朝刊）は、慰安婦問題検証・訂正・取り消し記事と『SAPIO』誌に掲載されたレポートに対して、編集人と小生に謝罪と訂正を求めた記事（38面）を掲載しました》
■待ちにまった暑い夏がやってきました。朝日新聞は、慰安婦問題が世紀の大誤報だったことを認めました。それにも拘わらず朝日新聞は、今回の記事でもまだ国民に謝罪をしていません。
この20年余、朝日新聞が報道した慰安婦問題の誤報は、STAP細胞の数百倍も国家国民を貶めたのであり、まず朝日新聞が行うことは、1990年代の慰安婦問題の記事を書いた記者並びに関係したセクションのOBを含めた責任者は、靖国神社の玉砂利に膝まづいて英霊に土下座することから始めなくてはいけません。
覚醒されていらっしゃるインターネットユーザーの皆様方と協力し、一気呵成に我が国の名誉を回復できる状況になりましたので、この記事が全国の良識ある国民に拡散されることを切に願っております。
朝日新聞（8月5日朝刊）は、慰安婦問題についての特集記事「慰安婦問題どう伝えたか 読者の疑問に答えます」との検証と訂正及び記事の取り消しを掲載しました。その中で「軍などが組織的に人さらいのように連行した資料は見つかっていません」とか「吉田氏が済州島で慰安婦を強制連行したとする証言は虚偽だと判断し、記事を取り消します」「女子挺身隊は、戦時下で女性を軍需工場などに動員した『女子勤労挺身隊』を指し、慰安婦とはまったく別です」などと、全面的に過去の記事の訂正と取り消しをしました。この検証まで20年余もかかったことは、マスメディアとして失格です。まともなメディアであれば、専門家に間違いを指摘されてから１ヶ月以内に訂正や記事の取り消しをするのが常道です。朝日新聞は新聞社の体をなしてないことを深く反省し、一度廃刊して出直すことが必要です。
それにしても姑息なのは、朝日新聞に対して一番厳しい批判をしていた「週刊新潮」が校了し、お盆休みに入った翌日の火曜日に検証記事を掲載したことは、たまたま偶然とは思えないタイミングです。芸能人が正月休み前の年末に、都合の悪い記者会見をセッティングすることと、似通っていて笑えます。
■これまでの朝日新聞の慰安婦記事に対して、今日一面で〈「慰安婦問題は朝日新聞の捏造だ」といういわれなき批判が起きています。…〉と開き直り、これまでの記事を〈慰安婦問題に光が当たり始めた90年代初め、研究は進んでいませんでした。〉と弁明して、検証記事がスタートしています。朝日新聞は崖っぷちにいることを、まだ理解できてないようだ。
朝日新聞は、プロの集団ではなく素人集団と誤解を招く言い訳をしていますが、「捏造」を広辞苑では「事実でない事を事実のようにこしらえて言うこと」とあり、これまでの朝日新聞が報道した「慰安婦記事」そのものではないのか。往生際が悪いとはこのことでしょう。
■朝日新聞（8月5日朝刊38面）《SAPIOに本社が抗議文「引用記事を歪曲」》の記事も掲載しています。
朝日新聞は、今回の検証記事と整合性があわない『SAPIO』の小生のレポートに対して、〈記事に引用した朝日新聞朝鮮版などの内容を意図的に歪曲して朝日新聞社の名誉と信用を著しく傷つけたとして、SAPIO編集人と執筆者のジャーナリスト水間政憲氏らに抗議するとともに、謝罪と訂正の記事を掲載するように求める文書を送った…〉とか、引用した記事は〈朝鮮伝統の妓生（キーセン）を紹介する内容で、「慰安婦」という言葉や慰安婦に関する記述はなかった。しかし、「朝日の記事を読むことで、戦場慰安婦の多くは高給目当てに妓生から転身したものだった、という歴史的経緯がはっきりするのである」などと記述した〉と、朝日新聞が、大々的に慰安婦の証言者として取り上げた金学順が妓生学校出身だったことを、今回の検証記事まで報道しなかったことを棚にあげ、〈朝日新聞社広報部は「引用記事を意図的に歪曲しており、当社への確認取材がないまま、当社の名誉と信用を著しく毀損する内容」としている〉と、紙面で小生を誹謗中傷することは、万死にに値する愚行なのだ。
朝日新聞よ！朝鮮版朝日新聞を大正4年から昭和20年まで通読すると、当時の朝鮮半島の社会情勢は手に取るように解るにも拘わらず、これまで20年余、「研究が進んでいませんでした」などと逃げるんじゃない。国民を愚弄するのもいい加減しろです。朝日新聞が数人のアルバイトを雇って、朝鮮版朝日新聞を数ヵ月チェックさせるだけで、朝鮮半島で女性を拉致誘拐して、売春婦として満州や南洋方面に売り飛ばしていた犯人は、すべて朝鮮人だったことが解るのに、小生が『SAPIO』に連載しも無視していたではないか。2010年4月29日の朝日新聞の記事『扇動社会』特集第1回の取材を受けた際、記者にたいして「いまサピオで朝日新聞を批判したレポートを連載しているけど、マズイじゃないの」と、記者二人に問うと、「どんどんやってもかまいません」と、感謝ともとれる返答をした若い社会部の記者もいたことで、今後の朝日新聞に少し期待をしていたのです。その時、小生が「朝日新聞本社に出向き、スクープの資料を提供したことがあり、いざ記事にできるタイミングのとき、その記者がその記事を書けないセクションに唐突に移動させらたことを話題にした」ら、記者が「半年前ですか」と応えたので「最近もあったの、もっと前」とだけ応えておきましたが、朝日新聞が全面戦争を臨むのであれば、願ったりかなったり、今回の検証記事で不明瞭なことがたくさんでてきましたので、昨年3月8日、衆議院予算委員会で中山成彬衆議院議員が「朝日新聞に委員会に来て頂いて検証」することを委員長に求めていたが、それを是非とも臨時国会で実現していただきたい。その時は、小生も参考人として招致していただき、朝日新聞が新聞社としての体をなしていないことを証言できることを切に願っています。因みに、小生が提供した資料をきっかけに、徹底的に東電の追及記事が掲載されていたら「福島第1原発事故を防げた可能性」があったのです。是非、国会で朝日新聞とやりあえることを切に望むところです。
朝日新聞が、朝鮮版朝日新聞を真摯し検証していたのであれば、朝鮮半島の実態を理解でき、大誤報の訂正はもっと早くできたであろう。この20年余、本来、朝日新聞がやるべき朝鮮版の記事を、コツコツ数年間チェックして国家国民の名誉と誇りを取り戻す作業をしてきた小生に感謝するのではなく、紙面で誹謗中傷することは、小生の著書を手にされ覚醒された多くの国民をも愚弄したことになるのです。
朝日新聞の検証記事「元慰安婦初の証言」では、〈キーセン学校は宴席での芸事を学ぶ施設だ。韓国での研究によると、学校を出て資格を得たキーセンと遊郭で働く遊女とは区別されていた。…〉と、記載してあるが、問題の朝鮮版朝日新聞の記事では、当時、妓生は4階級に区分され《〈最上級が「一牌」これは歌舞を主業とする官妓で次が「二牌」隱君子ともいう、賣笑婦に近いもの、次は「三牌」これは純然たる賣笑婦で雑歌くらいは歌えるもの、最後は蝎甫（カルボ）で三牌よりまだ下の賣女となっている…〉と、歌舞だけで食べられていたのは最上級の官妓だけで、あとのものは「売春婦」、つまり売春をしていた実態がレポートされていた》と記載してあり、当時、「キーセンと遊郭で働く遊女とは区別されていた。」との朝日新聞の今回の検証記事は、都合の悪いところは自社の記事より「韓国の研究によると」と、朝日新聞らしく逃げています。
当時の朝鮮版朝日新聞は、キーセンでもランクの下のものは「蝎甫（カルボ）」（売春婦）と、明確に断定していたのです。
今回、朝日新聞はキーセンの当時の取材記事では、〈朝鮮伝統の妓生を紹介する内容で、「慰安婦」という言葉や慰安婦に関する記述はなかった。…〉として、『SAPIO』が、戦前の朝鮮版朝日新聞の記事の引用文に「慰安婦」との記載あったような苦しい批判をしているが、引用文に「慰安婦」など記載していないにも拘わらず、記載していたように批判することは、「被害妄想」のいきに達しているのか、じっくり読んで頂ければ、当時の社会情勢と、朝日新聞が大々的に「従軍慰安婦」の証言をしたと報じた金学順がキーセン学校の出身だったこととキーセンの実態を、この20年余の間、触れなかったことの核心は、キーセンの実態が「売春婦」を兼ねていたことを知っていて、隠していたのではないか、との疑惑がより高まってくるのです。
◆ただ朝日新聞に敬意を表することは、朝日新聞に都合悪い研究者は小生だったことを婉曲に認めたことです。
※『朝日新聞が報道した「日韓併合」の真実 韓国が主張する「七奪」は日本の「七恩」だった』（徳間書店刊）と『ひと目でわかる日韓・日中歴史の真実』（PHP研究所刊）は、朝鮮版朝日新聞の記事で慰安婦問題の虚構を実証してありますので、良識ある国民に検証して戴けることを切に願っております。
◆良識ある国内外のインターネットユーザー皆様、朝日新聞へ、世紀の大誤報の謝罪と、国連人権委員会へ「吉田清治の記事を取り消した」ことを報告することを要求してください。
尚、SAPIO編集部に朝日新聞から抗議文書が、まだ届いてませんが、届いてからまた報告します。
※ジャーナリスト水間政憲;インターネットだけ転載フリー〈条件・全文掲載〉 http://mizumajyoukou.blog57.fc2.com/
ー
「生活保護」に最高裁判決
２０１４年７月１８日 最高裁判決。
永住資格を持つ外国人に「生活保護法」上の受給権が
あるかどうかで争われた訴訟の上告審で同日・最高裁は
「生活保護法の適用対象は日本国民に限られ外国人は含まれない」
との初の判断を示した。
然しながら現状は各自治体の裁量で外国人に実施して
いて、日本人から餓死者が出ていることに目を背けている。
何故こんな理不尽なことがまかり通っているのかというと
、選挙で選ばれる自治体の首長は「外国人団体の票」
欲しさに厚遇し、組織のない日本人個人を見殺しにして
いるという実情が読み取れる。
この現状を打破する為には、政府・国会議員が法律を
改正して「生活保護受給者の日本人の割合を５０％以上
とする」と定めないと市町村では改善できない。
本当に困っている日本人に救いの手を差し伸べて欲しいと切実に願うものである。
ー
